Every CODEOWNERS line is a rule
ownership/codeowners-parses@v1
Every line of CODEOWNERS that is not a comment reads as a rule, so no ownership is silently lost to a line the forge ignores.
| Id | ownership/codeowners-parses |
| Version | v1 |
| Category | ownership |
| Default severity | error |
| Interpreter | python3 |
| Timeout | 30 seconds |
| Violations tolerated | 0 |
| Collects | codeowners |
Collectors
This guardrail gathers nothing itself. It depends on the collectors below, which the CLI runs once per build before any check, and reads what they found out of GUARDRAIL_FACTS. A collector that collects nothing skips this guardrail rather than failing it.
| Collector | Gathers | Inputs it is given |
|---|---|---|
codeowners | The CODEOWNERS file the repository carries, read as rules rather than as text: every pattern in file order with the owners it names, how many rules each owner is named by, and the owners that apply to the paths a guardrail asks about, resolved the way GitHub resolves them, where the last rule to match a path is the one that owns it. | none |
The inputs above are this guardrail's own, passed straight through. Configuring one in buildnote.json changes what is collected, and two guardrails configured the same way share the one collection.
Configuration
{
"guardrails": {
"failOn": "error",
"comment": true,
"checks": [
{
"use": "ownership/codeowners-parses@v1",
"severity": "error",
"with": {},
"exemptions": []
}
]
}
}How to fix
Fix the lines named in the violations. A rule is a pattern, whitespace, then the owners:
/api/ @acme/backend @danaAn owner is a user (@dana), a team (@acme/backend) or an email address. A line that is none of those is ignored rather than reported, so the paths it meant to cover end up owned by whatever rule came before it.
More in ownership
ownership/catch-all-rule.CODEOWNERSdeclares a rule matching every path, so a file nobody thought about still has an owner.ownership/codeowners-present. The repository carries aCODEOWNERSfile naming at least one rule, so every change has somebody to review it.ownership/no-unowned-rules. No rule inCODEOWNERSnames an empty set of owners, which would take ownership away from everything it matches.ownership/owners-per-rule. Every rule inCODEOWNERSnames at least the minimum owners and no more than the maximum, so review is neither one person's bus factor nor everybody's problem.ownership/team-owned. Every rule inCODEOWNERSnames at least one team, so ownership survives the people currently in it.